It's more about trust when comes to umpiring, the decision they make on the field will involve in lot of thought process in a given spare of time. They need to trust in them in making decisions, at times they go either way although they need to go through it even it's hard enough to let it go.
The big scence comes when a decision have a huge impact on the game and it is not when it haven't make a impact. When it comes to calling on no-ball, it's not that easy to spot it as the margin for error is minimal in calling them.
These days we see lot of balls are rechecked when a batsmen is out, they recheck with the third umpire whether it is or isn't a no-ball before giving the decision. At times they are unsure with the minimal margin in calling them and they only have a single shot with half an second to judge it.
Unlike judging an LBW spotting exactly the no-ball is more difficult, where umpires can have a thought about it and will make the decision. When it comes to no-ball it's more about spotting it at the given time itself and it's more about going with the instincts and trusting them.
They have an option of going upstairs to recheck it, but they do it when they are unsure of it. When they aren't unsure they go with the trust in judging them, as they always make them. The third umpire can make decision where there will be enough time and evidence from him to make it, but it is not with the on field umpire.
Tuesday, 16 February 2016
Calling a No ball difficult than LBW
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment